Export limit exceeded: 23803 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 24528 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24528 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-84686 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 7.6 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. Notification template password fields are encrypted with a key derived from the secret key, the object primary key, and the field name, but not the subfield name, and the API returns the full ciphertext of a password subfield after the notification type is changed to one that does not define that subfield. A user with administrative access to a single notification template, but without any wider privilege, can switch the template type to reveal the stored ciphertext, replant that ciphertext into a webhook password field pointing at a server they control, and trigger a test notification. The controller decrypts the replayed ciphertext to the original plaintext and sends it to the attacker's server in an HTTP Basic authorization header, allowing recovery of Slack, PagerDuty, Twilio, AWS SNS, and Grafana credentials the administrator was only permitted to use, not read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84689 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The bulk job launch endpoint builds workflow job nodes from client input using a serializer that leaves the node's job reference -- a field normally set by the workflow task manager after it spawns a child job -- writable and does not include it in the permission validation performed for the other node fields. An authenticated user with permission to execute a single job template can submit a bulk job launch whose node references the identifier of any unified job in any organization, including jobs they cannot access. The node then exposes that job's metadata, and cancelling the attacker's workflow cancels the referenced job through the workflow cancellation cascade, without any per-job authorization check. Repeated, this allows a low-privileged user to cancel running jobs, project and inventory syncs, ad hoc commands, and system jobs across all organizations, denying automation service platform-wide. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84692 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The execute-permission check on a workflow job template node's unified job template is skipped when the node's currently stored unified job template is empty: the check inspects only the existing value, not the incoming one, and a node can be created without a unified job template. An authenticated user who holds admin permission on a single workflow job template can create an empty node and then patch it to reference any job template, project, inventory source, system job, or workflow on the platform -- including ones in other organizations that they cannot otherwise read or launch. Running their own workflow then executes the victim template with the victim's attached credentials, inventory and project, resulting in cross-organization privilege escalation to arbitrary automation execution. The patch response also discloses the victim template's name and description. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84703 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. When creating or editing an execution environment, the controller does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the container registry credential referenced by the execution environment; it validates only the organization and the credential kind. An authenticated user who is an execution-environment admin of one organization can associate a container registry credential belonging to a different organization -- one they cannot otherwise read, list, or use -- to an execution environment they control. When a job runs with that execution environment, the controller decrypts the foreign credential's registry password and supplies it to the container runtime, disclosing another organization's registry credentials across the tenant boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84707 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The host_filter query parameter on the hosts list API is parsed into a raw Django ORM filter whose lookup path is validated only against a sensitive-field blocklist, with no authorization check on the database relations it traverses. Because job event and ad-hoc command output fields are not on that blocklist, an authenticated user holding only the Read role on an inventory can construct filters that traverse into the output of jobs they have no permission to view and use the returned host count as a boolean oracle. Using regular-expression lookups, the attacker can extract, character by character, the output (which routinely contains plaintext credentials, tokens, and command results) of jobs and ad-hoc commands belonging to other organizations, resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of job output | ||||
| CVE-2026-84708 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. A user with the delegated Instance Group Admin role on a container group can set a free-form pod specification override that is deep-merged, without filtering, into every job pod launched on that group. The only hardening applied is forcing automountServiceAccountToken to false, which does not remove an explicitly declared projected serviceAccountToken volume or secret volume mounts. A non-superuser can therefore cause the kubelet to mint a ServiceAccount token for the control-plane automation-controller service account into the job container and mount arbitrary secrets from the control-plane namespace, obtaining the control-plane service-account identity on the Kubernetes API and cleartext control-plane secrets (including the platform database password and Django SECRET_KEY), leading to full platform data compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84709 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. When a custom credential type is created or updated, the injector configuration is validated by rendering each attacker-supplied Jinja2 template synchronously inside the web request worker, with no limit on iteration count, output size, or execution time. An authenticated superuser can submit a credential type whose injector contains deeply nested loops or large string operations, consuming CPU and wall-clock time in the web worker until it is killed by the request timeout; issuing enough concurrent requests places all web workers into a kill-and-respawn loop, making the Controller API and UI unavailable for the duration of the attack. Additionally, certain template constructs raise exception types that the validator does not handle, resulting in an unhandled server error (HTTP 500) instead of a clean validation error. The rendering sandbox prevents code execution, so there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84711 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The Project SCM branch and SCM refspec fields are accepted without rejecting values that begin with a dash and are passed to the git module during project synchronization, where they reach a `git checkout`/`git fetch` command line as bare arguments with no end-of-options separator. An authenticated user permitted to create or edit a project can set the SCM branch to a git option such as `--pathspec-from-file=<path>`, causing git to read an arbitrary file on the synchronization host and reflect its contents back through the project-update output. Because project synchronization runs on the control-plane host on default OpenShift Operator deployments, an attacker can read the control-plane Kubernetes ServiceAccount token, the Controller SECRET_KEY, and the database credentials, leading to full compromise of the Automation Platform and its Kubernetes namespace. System administrator privileges are not required and the impact crosses tenants. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93676 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-22 | 3.2 Low |
| xdg-dbus-proxy incorrectly filters D-Bus broadcast messages, bypassing configured path, interface, and member restrictions. This allows a sandboxed Flatpak application to intercept broadcast signals on the D-Bus session bus and AT-SPI bus that should be restricted, potentially exposing sensitive information to unauthorized applications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5704 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 6 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-09-22 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in tar. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious archive, leading to hidden file injection with fully attacker-controlled content. This bypasses pre-extraction inspection mechanisms, potentially allowing an attacker to introduce malicious files onto a system without detection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92599 | 2 Hapijs, Redhat | 2 Joi, Hummingbird | 2026-09-22 | 7.5 High |
| joi (npm package `joi`, hapi.js) versions >=17.2.0 <17.13.7 and >=18.0.0 <18.2.6 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service in the `Joi.string().isoDate()` validation rule. One of the regular expressions the rule applies to the input is unanchored, so a valid ISO date followed by a long run of fractional-second digits causes the regex engine to restart its search from every position in the string, yielding time proportional to the square of the input length (about 1.4 s for 64 KB of digits and about 22 s for 256 KB). A remote attacker who can supply a string to an isoDate validation can stall the application with a single request. Fixed in 17.13.7 and 18.2.6; as a workaround, cap the length of the string before it reaches joi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59849 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-09-22 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. Logic errors in automatic certificate-based public key authentication can cause libssh clients to loop indefinitely when configured certificates are missing or repeatedly rejected by a server, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59842 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-09-22 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. During server-side GSSAPI key exchange, a client-supplied Curve25519 public key shorter than the expected length is copied without proper length validation, leading to an out-of-bounds heap read. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to disclose small amounts of server memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15370 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-09-22 | 6.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. During SFTP server directory listing, the longname field is constructed with unsafe concatenation into a fixed-size stack buffer. When a client causes the server to list attacker-controlled filenames, sufficiently long names can overflow that stack buffer and may lead to crashes or possible code execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95508 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the DHCPv6 and TFTP response builders of libslirp. When the host is configured with a small interface MTU, a guest-supplied DHCPv6 CLIENTID option or TFTP blksize option can overflow the reply buffer with attacker-controlled content and length, resulting in denial of service and potentially arbitrary code execution in the host process. The default interface MTU is not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90997 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 2 Keycloak, Build Keycloak | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. When deployed in stateless mode with MySQL or MariaDB, a mismatch in row-count semantics between the database driver and Keycloak's application logic allows an attacker to bypass replay protection. This vulnerability enables an attacker who intercepts single-use security artifacts, such as JWT client assertions, DPoP proofs, or one-time password (TOTP) codes, to replay them. Successful exploitation grants unauthorized access to the token endpoint or login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32591 | 1 Redhat | 3 Mirror Registry, Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift, Quay | 2026-09-22 | 5.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Proxy Cache configuration feature. When an organization administrator configures an upstream registry for proxy caching, Quay makes a network connection to the specified registry hostname without verifying that it points to a legitimate external service. An attacker with organization administrator privileges could supply a crafted hostname to force the Quay server to make requests to internal network services, cloud infrastructure endpoints, or other resources that should not be accessible from the Quay application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15927 | 1 Redhat | 4 Mirror Registry, Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift, Quay and 1 more | 2026-09-22 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's repository-level mirror configuration feature. The POST and PUT handlers in endpoints/api/mirror.py accept an external_reference parameter without SSRF validation, unlike the organization-level mirror handlers which apply validate_external_registry_url(). A repository administrator can supply a crafted hostname that causes the Quay mirror worker to make requests via Skopeo to internal network services, cloud metadata endpoints, or other resources not intended to be reachable from the Quay application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94001 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-09-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Admin REST API of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. The endpoint used for deleting user credentials does not correctly check for fine-grained reset-password permissions. This allows a delegated administrator, who should be restricted from resetting passwords, to delete a user's password credentials, resulting in the user being unable to log in. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91147 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Dev Spaces, Openshift Devspaces | 2026-09-22 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in `cockpit-ws`. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted request. When the `WebService.UrlRoot` is configured and a request is made to the exact URL-root prefix without a trailing slash, `cockpit-ws` can terminate unexpectedly. This issue leads to the unavailability of the Cockpit web service. | ||||