Export limit exceeded: 15615 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 29740 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29740 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13460 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Aspera Console, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-03-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Aspera Console 3.3.0 through 3.4.8 could allow an attacker to enumerate usernames due to an observable response discrepancy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32702 | 2 Cleanuparr, Cleanuparr Project | 2 Cleanuparr, Cleanuparr | 2026-03-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cleanuparr is a tool for automating the cleanup of unwanted or blocked files in Sonarr, Radarr, and supported download clients like qBittorrent. From 2.7.0 to 2.8.0, the /api/auth/login endpoint contains a logic flaw that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames by measuring the application's response time. It appears that the hashing function, which is the most time-consuming part of the process by design, occurs as part of the VerifyPassword function. With the short circuits occurring before the hashing function, a timing differential is introduced that exposes validity to the actor. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60012 | 1 Apache | 1 Livy | 2026-03-23 | 6.3 Medium |
| Malicious configuration can lead to unauthorized file access in Apache Livy. This issue affects Apache Livy 0.7.0 and 0.8.0 when connecting to Apache Spark 3.1 or later. A request that includes a Spark configuration value supported from Apache Spark version 3.1 can lead to users gaining access to files they do not have permissions to. For the vulnerability to be exploitable, the user needs to have access to Apache Livy's REST or JDBC interface and be able to send requests with arbitrary Spark configuration values. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.9.0 or later, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2859 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2026-03-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| Improper permission enforcement in Checkmk versions 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p23, 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p43, and 2.2.0 (EOL) allows unauthenticated users to enumerate existing hosts by observing different HTTP response codes in deploy_agent endpoint, which could lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20096 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI firmware for some Intel Reference Platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data manipulation. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20027 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI WheaERST module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20064 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI FlashUcAcmSmm module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20068 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI ImcErrorHandler module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20105 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in some UEFI firmware SMM module for the Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13462 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| The "tarfile" module would still apply normalization of AREGTYPE (\x00) blocks to DIRTYPE, even while processing a multi-block member such as GNUTYPE_LONGNAME or GNUTYPE_LONGLINK. This could result in a crafted tar archive being misinterpreted by the tarfile module compared to other implementations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22203 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-13 | 4.9 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows administrators to inadvertently expose OAuth secrets by exporting plugin options as JSON. Attackers can obtain exported files containing plaintext API secrets like fbAppSecret, googleClientSecret, twitterAppSecret, and other social login credentials from support tickets, backups, or version control repositories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24097 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper permission enforcement in Checkmk versions 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p23, 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p43, and 2.2.0 (EOL) allows authenticated users to enumerate existing hosts by observing different HTTP response codes in agent-receiver/register_existing endpoint, which could lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31900 | 1 Psf | 1 Black | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Black is the uncompromising Python code formatter. Black provides a GitHub action for formatting code. This action supports an option, use_pyproject: true, for reading the version of Black to use from the repository pyproject.toml. A malicious pull request could edit pyproject.toml to use a direct URL reference to a malicious repository. This could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the GitHub Action. Attackers could then gain access to secrets or permissions available in the context of the action. Version 26.3.0 fixes this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22052 | 1 Netapp | 2 Ontap, Ontap 9 | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| ONTAP versions 9.12.1 and higher with S3 NAS buckets are susceptible to an information disclosure vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated attacker to view a listing of the contents in a directory for which they lack permission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22204 | 1 Gvectors | 1 Wpdiscuz | 2026-03-13 | 3.7 Low |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an email header injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate mail recipients by injecting malicious data into the comment_author_email cookie. Attackers can craft a malicious cookie value that, when processed through urldecode() and passed to wp_mail() functions, enables header injection to alter email recipients or inject additional headers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32098 | 1 Parse Community | 1 Parse Server | 2026-03-12 | N/A |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to 9.6.0-alpha.9 and 8.6.35, an attacker can exploit LiveQuery subscriptions to infer the values of protected fields without directly receiving them. By subscribing with a WHERE clause that references a protected field (including via dot-notation or $regex), the attacker can observe whether LiveQuery events are delivered for matching objects. This creates a boolean oracle that leaks protected field values. The attack affects any class that has both protectedFields configured in Class-Level Permissions and LiveQuery enabled. This vulnerability is fixed in 9.6.0-alpha.9 and 8.6.35. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32094 | 1 Ericcornelissen | 1 Shescape | 2026-03-12 | N/A |
| Shescape is a simple shell escape library for JavaScript. Prior to 2.1.10, Shescape#escape() does not escape square-bracket glob syntax for Bash, BusyBox sh, and Dash. Applications that interpolate the return value directly into a shell command string can cause an attacker-controlled value like secret[12] to expand into multiple filesystem matches instead of a single literal argument, turning one argument into multiple trusted-pathname matches. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20164 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.3, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, 10.0.2503.11, and 9.3.2411.123, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could access the `/splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords` REST API endpoint, which exposes the hashed or plaintext password values that are stored in the passwords.conf configuration file due to improper access control. This vulnerability could allow for the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30901 | 1 Zoom | 1 Rooms | 2026-03-12 | 7 High |
| Improper Input Validation in Zoom Rooms for Windows before 6.6.5 in Kiosk Mode may allow an authenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20166 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-03-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.1 and 10.0.4, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, and 10.0.2503.12, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could retrieve the Observability Cloud API access token through the Discover Splunk Observability Cloud app due to improper access control. This vulnerability does not affect Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.9 and 9.3.10 because the Discover Splunk Observability Cloud app does not come with Splunk Enterprise. | ||||