Search
Search Results (15889 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23638 | 2 Redhat, Squid-cache | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2024-08-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Due to an expired pointer reference bug, Squid prior to version 6.6 is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack against Cache Manager error responses. This problem allows a trusted client to perform Denial of Service when generating error pages for Client Manager reports. Squid older than 5.0.5 have not been tested and should be assumed to be vulnerable. All Squid-5.x up to and including 5.9 are vulnerable. All Squid-6.x up to and including 6.5 are vulnerable. This bug is fixed by Squid version 6.6. In addition, patches addressing this problem for the stable releases can be found in Squid's patch archives. As a workaround, prevent access to Cache Manager using Squid's main access control: `http_access deny manager`. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4076 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2024-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| Client queries that trigger serving stale data and that also require lookups in local authoritative zone data may result in an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.13 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, 9.11.33-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.13-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1970 | 2024-05-29 | 0.0 Low | ||
| The originally reported issue in https://github.com/syedsohaibkarim/OpenRedirect-Keycloak18.0.0 is a known misconfiguration, and recommendation already exists in the Keycloak documentation to mitigate the issue: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/index.html#open-redirectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27458 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2024-05-01 | 7.5 High |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-27447. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2022-27447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-27447 instead of this candidate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26908 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2024-04-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0644 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2019-3892 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-11599. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-11599. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-11599 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7775 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2015-3208 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||