| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX 1.5 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 210574. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0. 0 through 6.1.1.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 210171. |
| IBM Security Verify 10.0.0, 10.0.1.0, and 10.0.2.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 210067. |
| IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 1.0 and 6.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 209508. |
| IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 207980. |
| Apache James prior to release 3.6.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. This can result in Man-in -the-middle command injection attacks, leading potentially to leakage of sensible information. |
| InHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 have inadequate encryption strength, which may allow an attacker to intercept the communication and steal sensitive information or hijack the session. |
| The affected product uses a hard-coded blowfish key for encryption/decryption processes. The key can be easily extracted from binaries. |
| Meow hash 0.5/calico does not sufficiently thwart key recovery by an attacker who can query whether there's a collision in the bottom bits of the hashes of two messages, as demonstrated by an attack against a long-running web service that allows the attacker to infer collisions by measuring timing differences. |
| In Charm 0.43, any two users can collude to achieve the ability to decrypt YCT14 data. |
| In Charm 0.43, any single user can decrypt DAC-MACS or MA-ABE-YJ14 data. |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.1, an insecure key generation mechanism for encrypted properties was used. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.7.0). The SSH server on affected devices is configured to offer weak ciphers by default.
This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to read and modify any data passed over the connection between legitimate clients and the affected device. |
| Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in the function mbedtls_mpi_exp_mod() in lignum.c in Mbed TLS Mbed TLS all versions before 3.0.0, 2.27.0 or 2.16.11 allows attackers with access to precise enough timing and memory access information (typically an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave such as SGX or the TrustZone secure world) to recover the private keys used in RSA. |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite version 3.3.1 and prior support insecure Transport Security Protocols TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 which are susceptible to Man-In-The-Middle attacks thereby compromising Confidentiality and Integrity of data. |
| Dell EMC InsightIQ, versions prior to 4.1.4, contain risky cryptographic algorithms in the SSH component. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to authentication bypass and remote takeover of the InsightIQ. This allows an attacker to take complete control of InsightIQ to affect services provided by SSH; so Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u311, 8u301, 11.0.12; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.3 and 21.2.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| An entity in Network Configuration Manager product is misconfigured and exposing password field to Solarwinds Information Service (SWIS). Exposed credentials are encrypted and require authenticated access with an NCM role.
|
| iDrive RemotePC before 7.6.48 on Windows allows information disclosure. A man in the middle can recover a system's Personal Key when a client attempts to make a LAN connection. The Personal Key is transmitted over the network while only being encrypted via a substitution cipher. |
| In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange. |
