Search Results (28321 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2012-10058 2026-04-15 N/A
RabidHamster R4 v1.25 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability due to unsafe use of sprintf() when logging malformed HTTP requests. A remote attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted URI, resulting in arbitrary code execution under the context of the web server process.
CVE-2025-2826 2026-04-15 2.6 Low
n affected platforms running Arista EOS, ACL policies may not be enforced. IPv4 ingress ACL, MAC ingress ACL, or IPv6 standard ingress ACL enabled on one or more ethernet or LAG interfaces may result in ACL policies not being enforced for ingress packets. This can cause incoming packets to incorrectly be allowed or denied. The two symptoms of this issue on the affected release and platform are: * Packets which should be permitted may be dropped and, * Packets which should be dropped may be permitted.
CVE-2024-24972 1 Gallagher 2 Controller 6000, Controller 7000 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (CWE-120) in the Controller 6000 and Controller 7000 diagnostic web interface allows an authorised and authenticated operator to reboot the Controller, causing a Denial of Service. Gallagher recommend the diagnostic web page is not enabled (default is off) unless advised by Gallagher Technical support. This interface is intended only for diagnostic purposes. This issue affects: Controller 6000 and Controller 7000 9.10 prior to vCR9.10.240816a (distributed in 9.10.1530 (MR2)), 9.00 prior to vCR9.00.240816a (distributed in 9.00.2168 (MR4)), 8.90 prior to vCR8.90.240816a (distributed in 8.90.2155 (MR5)), 8.80 prior to vCR8.80.240816b (distributed in 8.80.1938 (MR6)), all versions of 8.70 and prior.
CVE-2024-3079 1 Asus 7 Rt-ac68u Firmware, Rt-ac86u Firmware, Rt-ax57 Firmware and 4 more 2026-04-15 7.2 High
Certain models of ASUS routers have buffer overflow vulnerabilities, allowing remote attackers with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary commands on the device.
CVE-2025-23272 1 Nvidia 2 Cuda Toolkit, Nvjpeg 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
NVIDIA nvJPEG library contains a vulnerability where an attacker can cause an out-of-bounds read by means of a specially crafted JPEG file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure or denial of service.
CVE-2025-52536 1 Amd 8 Epyc 7003 Series Processors, Epyc 8004 Series Processors, Epyc 9004 Series Processors and 5 more 2026-04-15 N/A
Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification in SEV firmware could allow a privileged attacker to downgrade firmware potentially resulting in a loss of integrity.
CVE-2024-31081 1 Redhat 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more 2026-04-15 7.3 High
A heap-based buffer over-read vulnerability was found in the X.org server's ProcXIPassiveGrabDevice() function. This issue occurs when byte-swapped length values are used in replies, potentially leading to memory leakage and segmentation faults, particularly when triggered by a client with a different endianness. This vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to cause the X server to read heap memory values and then transmit them back to the client until encountering an unmapped page, resulting in a crash. Despite the attacker's inability to control the specific memory copied into the replies, the small length values typically stored in a 32-bit integer can result in significant attempted out-of-bounds reads.
CVE-2024-3185 1 Rapid7 1 Insight Agent 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
A key used in logging.json does not follow the least privilege principle by default and is exposed to local users in the Rapid7 Platform. This allows an attacker with local access to a machine with the logging.json file to use that key to authenticate to the platform with high privileges. This was fixed in the Rapid7 platform starting 3 April 2024 via the introduction of a restricted role and the removal of automatic API key generation on installation of an agent.
CVE-2014-125114 2026-04-15 N/A
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in i-Ftp version 2.20 due to improper handling of the Time attribute within Schedule.xml. By placing a specially crafted Schedule.xml file in the i-Ftp application directory, a remote attacker can trigger a buffer overflow during scheduled download parsing, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or a crash.
CVE-2024-37310 1 Everest 1 Everest-core 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
EVerest is an EV charging software stack. An integer overflow in the "v2g_incoming_v2gtp" function in the v2g_server.cpp implementation can allow a remote attacker to overflow the process' heap. This vulnerability is fixed in 2024.3.1 and 2024.6.0.
CVE-2025-22392 1 Intel 2 Amt, Standard Manageability 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in firmware for some Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via network access.
CVE-2025-20101 1 Intel 1 Graphics Drivers 2026-04-15 8.4 High
Out-of-bounds read for some Intel(R) Graphics Drivers may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure or denial of service via local access.
CVE-2024-42011 1 Spotify 1 Spotify App 2026-04-15 7.5 High
The Spotify app 8.9.58 for iOS has a buffer overflow in its use of strcat.
CVE-2025-32061 1 Bosch 1 Infotainment System Ecu 2026-04-15 8.8 High
The specific flaw exists within the Bluetooth stack developed by Alps Alpine of the Infotainment ECU manufactured by Bosch. The issue results from the lack of proper boundary validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a stack-based buffer overflow when receiving a specific packet on the established upper layer L2CAP channel. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to obtain remote code execution on the Infotainment ECU with root privileges. First identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020.
CVE-2025-22839 1 Intel 3 Processors, Xeon, Xeon Processors 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Insufficient granularity of access control in the OOB-MSM for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Scalable processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access.
CVE-2024-38509 2026-04-15 7.2 High
A privilege escalation vulnerability was discovered in XCC that could allow an authenticated XCC user with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted IPMI command.
CVE-2025-22889 1 Intel 3 Processor, Xeon, Xeon Processors 2026-04-15 7.9 High
Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processor with Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2024-5535 2 Openssl, Redhat 7 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 4 more 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
CVE-2010-20107 2026-04-15 N/A
A stack-based buffer overflow exists in FTP Synchronizer Professional <= v4.0.73.274. When the client connects to an FTP server and issues a LIST command—typically during sync preview or profile creation—the server’s response containing an overly long filename triggers a buffer overflow. This results in the corruption of the Structured Exception Handler (SEH), potentially allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2024-13503 2026-04-15 N/A
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in Newtec NTC2218, NTC2250, NTC2299 on Linux, PowerPC, ARM (Updating signaling process in the swdownload binary modules) allows Local Execution of Code, Remote Code Inclusion. This issue affects NTC2218, NTC2250, NTC2299: from 1.0.1.1 through 2.2.6.19. The issue is both present on the PowerPC versions of the modem and the ARM versions. A stack buffer buffer overflow in the swdownload binary allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. The parse_INFO function uses an unrestricted `sscanf` to read a string of an incoming network packet into a statically sized buffer.