| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php. |
| SSRF vulnerability in remotedownload.php in Allen Disk 1.6 allows remote authenticated users to conduct port scans and access intranet servers via a crafted file parameter. |
| In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is insufficient redirect validation in the HTTP class, leading to SSRF. |
| distribute-cache.c in ImageMagick re-uses objects after they have been destroyed, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unspecified vectors. |
| The flash-based vSphere Web Client (6.0 prior to 6.0 U3c and 5.5 prior to 5.5 U3f) i.e. not the new HTML5-based vSphere Client, contains SSRF and CRLF injection issues due to improper neutralization of URLs. An attacker may exploit these issues by sending a POST request with modified headers towards internal services leading to information disclosure. |
| Mahara 1.8 before 1.8.7 and 1.9 before 1.9.5 and 1.10 before 1.10.3 and 15.04 before 15.04.0 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery attacks as not all processes of curl redirects are checked against a white or black list. Employing SafeCurl will prevent issues. |
| IBM Forms Experience Builder could be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) from the application design interface allowing for some information disclosure of internal resources. |
| PHP through 7.1.11 enables potential SSRF in applications that accept an fsockopen or pfsockopen hostname argument with an expectation that the port number is constrained. Because a :port syntax is recognized, fsockopen will use the port number that is specified in the hostname argument, instead of the port number in the second argument of the function. |
| An issue was discovered on Accellion FTA devices before FTA_9_12_180. Because a regular expression (intended to match local https URLs) lacks an initial ^ character, courier/web/1000@/wmProgressval.html allows SSRF attacks with a file:///etc/passwd#https:// URL pattern. |
| Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. |
| The media-file upload feature in GeniXCMS through 0.0.8 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via a URL, as demonstrated by a URL with an intranet IP address. |
| SSRF exists in Webmin 1.850 via the PATH_INFO to tunnel/link.cgi, as demonstrated by a GET request for tunnel/link.cgi/http://INTRANET-IP:8000. |
| The Ping() function in ui/api/target.go in Harbor through 1.3.0-rc4 has SSRF via the endpoint parameter to /api/targets/ping. |
| An XML injection vulnerability in Junos OS CLI can allow a locally authenticated user to elevate privileges and run arbitrary commands as the root user. This issue was found during internal product security testing. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D47, 15.1 prior to 15.1R3. Junos versions prior to 15.1 are not affected. No other Juniper Networks products or platforms are affected by this issue. |
| In FineCMS before 2017-07-06, application/lib/ajax/get_image_data.php has SSRF, related to requests for non-image files with a modified HTTP Host header. |
| In the GetSimple CMS CE 3.3.19 management page, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) can be achieved in the plug-in download address in the backend management system. |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.4.0. Due to a lack of input validation on URLs in threat intelligence, an attacker with low-level access to the system can trigger Server Side Request Forgery. |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.4.0. A path injection vulnerability is seen while adding a CSV enrichment source. The source_name parameter could be changed to an absolute path; this will write the CSV file to that path inside the /tmp directory. |
| SparkShop <=1.1.7 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability allows attacks to scan ports on the Intranet or local network where the server resides, attack applications running on the Intranet or local network, or read metadata on the cloud server. |
| The tested version of Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X has a Terminal Emulator application which could be leveraged by an attacker to gain elevated privileges on a device and/or install malicious code. |
