| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Certificate Validation user interface in LibreOffice allows potential vulnerability.
Signed macros are scripts that have been digitally signed by the
developer using a cryptographic signature. When a document with a signed
macro is opened a warning is displayed by LibreOffice before the macro
is executed.
Previously if verification failed the user could fail to understand the failure and choose to enable the macros anyway.
This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.2 before 24.2.5. |
| It's possible for a gRPC client communicating with a HTTP/2 proxy to poison the HPACK table between the proxy and the backend such that other clients see failed requests. It's also possible to use this vulnerability to leak other clients HTTP header keys, but not values.
This occurs because the error status for a misencoded header is not cleared between header reads, resulting in subsequent (incrementally indexed) added headers in the first request being poisoned until cleared from the HPACK table.
Please update to a fixed version of gRPC as soon as possible. This bug has been fixed in 1.58.3, 1.59.5, 1.60.2, 1.61.3, 1.62.3, 1.63.2, 1.64.3, 1.65.4. |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit of r and s is zero. |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-11023. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-11023. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-11023 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-27447. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2022-27447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-27447 instead of this candidate. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |