| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 2 "Abuse the queue for network disruptions" of CVE-2022-47522.
Affected devices can be tricked into enabling its power-saving mechanisms for a victim client. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to execute disconnection and denial-of-service attacks. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions). This CVE refers to Scenario 1 "Leak frames from the Wi-Fi queue" of CVE-2022-47522.
Affected devices queue frames in order to subsequently change the security context and leak the queued frames. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to intercept (possibly cleartext) target-destined frames. |
| A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability was identified in mlflow/mlflow, specifically in version 2.9.2, which was fixed in version 2.11.3. This vulnerability arises from the application's failure to properly validate URI fragments for directory traversal sequences such as '../'. An attacker can exploit this flaw by manipulating the fragment part of the URI to read arbitrary files on the local file system, including sensitive files like '/etc/passwd'. The vulnerability is a bypass to a previous patch that only addressed similar manipulation within the URI's query string, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation of all parts of a URI to prevent LFI attacks. |
| A TarSlip vulnerability exists in the deepjavalibrary/djl, affecting version 0.26.0 and fixed in version 0.27.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to manipulate file paths within tar archives to overwrite arbitrary files on the target system. Exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to remote code execution, privilege escalation, data theft or manipulation, and denial of service. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of file paths during the extraction of tar files, as demonstrated in multiple occurrences within the library's codebase, including but not limited to the files_util.py and extract_imagenet.py scripts. |
| A path traversal and arbitrary file upload vulnerability exists in the parisneo/lollms-webui application, specifically within the `@router.get("/switch_personal_path")` endpoint in `./lollms-webui/lollms_core/lollms/server/endpoints/lollms_user.py`. The vulnerability arises due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input for the `path` parameter, allowing an attacker to specify arbitrary file system paths. This flaw enables direct arbitrary file uploads, leakage of `personal_data`, and overwriting of configurations in `lollms-webui`->`configs` by exploiting the same named directory in `personal_data`. The issue affects the latest version of the application and is fixed in version 9.4. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure, unauthorized file uploads, and potentially remote code execution by overwriting critical configuration files. |
| Allow attackers to intercept or falsify data exchanges between the client
and the server |
| A vulnerability in the parisneo/lollms-webui allows for arbitrary file upload and read due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input. Specifically, the issue resides in the `install_model()` function within `lollms_core/lollms/binding.py`, where the application fails to properly sanitize the `file://` protocol and other inputs, leading to arbitrary read and upload capabilities. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the `path` and `variant_name` parameters to achieve path traversal, allowing for the reading of arbitrary files and uploading files to arbitrary locations on the server. This vulnerability affects the latest version of parisneo/lollms-webui. |
| parisneo/lollms-webui is vulnerable to path traversal attacks that can lead to remote code execution due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in the 'Database path' and 'PDF LaTeX path' settings. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating these settings to execute arbitrary code on the targeted server. The issue affects the latest version of the software. The vulnerability stems from the application's handling of the 'discussion_db_name' and 'pdf_latex_path' parameters, which do not properly validate file paths, allowing for directory traversal. This vulnerability can also lead to further file exposure and other attack vectors by manipulating the 'discussion_db_name' parameter. |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the '/apply_settings' endpoint of parisneo/lollms-webui allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability arises due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in the configuration settings, specifically within the 'extensions' parameter. Attackers can exploit this by crafting a payload that includes relative path traversal sequences ('../../../'), enabling them to navigate to arbitrary directories. This flaw subsequently allows the server to load and execute a malicious '__init__.py' file, leading to remote code execution. The issue affects the latest version of parisneo/lollms-webui. |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the parisneo/lollms-webui, specifically within the 'copy_to_custom_personas' endpoint in the 'lollms_personalities_infos.py' file. This vulnerability allows attackers to read arbitrary files by manipulating the 'category' and 'name' parameters during the 'Copy to custom personas folder for editing' process. By inserting '../' sequences in these parameters, attackers can traverse the directory structure and access files outside of the intended directory. Successful exploitation results in unauthorized access to sensitive information. |
| Serverpod is an app and web server, built for the Flutter and Dart ecosystem. This bug bypassed the validation of TSL certificates on all none web HTTP clients in the `serverpod_client` package. Making them susceptible to a man in the middle attack against encrypted traffic between the client device and the server. An attacker would need to be able to intercept the traffic and highjack the connection to the server for this vulnerability to be used. Upgrading to version `1.2.6` resolves this issue.
|
| Veeam Backup Enterprise Manager allows high-privileged users to steal NTLM hash of Enterprise manager service account. |
| Veeam Backup Enterprise Manager allows account takeover via NTLM relay. |
| A vulnerability in Samsung Exynos Modem 5300 allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to downgrade the security mode of packets going to the victim, enabling the attacker to send messages to the victim in plaintext. |
| A vulnerability exists in the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server that affects the message
queueing mechanism’s certificate validation. If exploited an attacker could spoof a trusted entity causing a loss of confidentiality
and integrity. |
| The Toyoko Inn official App for iOS versions prior to 1.13.0 and Toyoko Inn official App for Android versions prior 1.3.14 don't properly verify server certificates, which allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in WP Happy Coders Comments Like Dislike allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Comments Like Dislike: from n/a through 1.2.2. |
| A default installation of RustDesk 1.2.3 on Windows places a WDKTestCert certificate under Trusted Root Certification Authorities with Enhanced Key Usage of Code Signing (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3), valid from 2023 until 2033. This is potentially unwanted, e.g., because there is no public documentation of security measures for the private key, and arbitrary software could be signed if the private key were to be compromised. NOTE: the vendor's position is "we do not have EV cert, so we use test cert as a workaround." Insertion into Trusted Root Certification Authorities was the originally intended behavior, and the UI ensured that the certificate installation step (checked by default) was visible to the user before proceeding with the product installation. |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.0, 11.2.1, 11.2.2, 11.2.3, 11.2.4, 12.0.0, 12.0.1, and 12.0.2 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation when using the IBM Planning Analytics Data Source Connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between IBM Planning Analytics server and IBM Cognos Analytics server. IBM X-Force ID: 283364. |
| The Online-Ausweis-Funktion eID scheme in the German National Identity card through 2024-02-15 allows authentication bypass by spoofing. A man-in-the-middle attacker can assume a victim's identify for access to government, medical, and financial resources, and can also extract personal data from the card, aka the "sPACE (Spoofing Password Authenticated Connection Establishment)" issue. This occurs because of a combination of factors, such as insecure PIN entry (for basic readers) and eid:// deeplinking. The victim must be using a modified eID kernel, which may occur if the victim is tricked into installing a fake version of an official app. NOTE: the BSI position is "ensuring a secure operational environment at the client side is an obligation of the ID card owner." |
